|CCGT||490||Median value from above publication|
|Nuclear||12||Median value from above publication|
|Biomass||505||Average of the 2 Biomas Median values from above publication|
|Coal||820||Median value from above publication|
|Wind||11||Median value from above publication|
|Solar||48||Median value from above publication|
|Oil||733||Value from "Comparison of Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Various Electricity Generation Sources"|
|OCGT||588||Median value from above publication for ccgt + 20%|
|HydroElectric||24||Median value from above publication|
|Pumped Hydro||477|| Assumes that the plant produces 70% of the energy needed to pump the water to the higher resevoir.|
The co2 for this will come from other fuels so a calculation is made with CCGT being 50% of the co2 and the rest being split between Nuclear,Biomass,Wind and Solar.
TO this figure is added the Co2 of a Non Pumped HydroElectrical.
(( 100/70 )* (( CCGT/2 )+((( Nuclear +Biomass +Wind +Solar )/4)/2))) +Hydroelectric
|Interconnectors||317||These use the calculation ( CCGT/2 ) +((( Nuclear +Biomass +Wind+Solar )/4)/2).|
There is likely scope to attribute different values to each interconnector as the mix of fuels will differ
(ie The French Interconnector will use a high percentage of Nuclear)
Only interconnectors importing are added to the total as the co2e produced for exporting is already accounted for under each fuel.
|Other||317||I do not currently have the break down of this|
so have used the use the calculation (CCGT/2) +((( Nuclear +Biomass +Wind +Solar) /4) /2).
Although you are in no way obligated, some users have requested a way to support the project.
A big thank you goes out to all the donors who have already contributed.